10-28-2013, 11:41 AM | #23 |
Major General
5323
Rep 5,824
Posts |
And thus it begins...
Munich. The TV campaign for the BMW i3, the BMW Group’s first series-produced, pure-electric vehicle, got underway on last weekend in all relevant European markets. The BMW i3 will debut on the market on 16 November 2013. The BMW i3 TV commercial “Decisions” opens over the skyscrapers of Chicago; the camera swoops down to focus in on two cars driving side-by-side through the backstreets of the city – a BMW i3 and a BMW i8. The narrator talks about the future-shaping decisions the company had to make to reinvent the automobile from the ground up – to create an electric vehicle with a passenger cell made of carbon fibre offering a range of intelligent mobility services. Each fundamental choice is visualised as the cars change direction at junctions. As the decisions become more concrete and more detailed, the camera zooms in closer on the BMW i3. The camera finally peers inside the car through the rear window. It shows the interior as it drives with the viewer along the road. Now, at the latest, it becomes clear what is unique about this commercial: It is a so-called “one taker”, with no breaks in the film to interrupt the camera’s long flight, which starts over the roofs of the city and continues through the car to reveal the BMW i3 in all its uniqueness at the end. This seamless camera tracking was made possible using a helicopter in combination with the latest cinema-quality 3D animation technology. The BMW i TV commercial was shot on location in Chicago. The creative agency responsible is Dorten (Berlin/Stuttgart), with film production by Hochkant Film (Munich). The music comes from young Munich band Claire with their track “Horizon”. Uwe Dreher, responsible for global marketing communications for the BMW i, sums up: “The new TV spot is the highpoint of our BMW i3 launch campaign. The viewer experiences the lengthy decision-making process behind the BMW i3 in fast motion, so that, at the end, it feels like you are right inside the car. The film will make viewers eager to experience for themselves the fascinating and unique driving feeling and typical BMW driving pleasure the electric BMW i3 has to offer.” The team also produced a number of short films to communicate specific product information about the BMW i3. These focus on the BMW i3’s unique key features, such as BMW eDrive, BMW Connected Drive, interior design and home charging. The six 15-second spots are designed to showcase the BMW i3’s everyday driveability and encourage viewers to take a test drive to discover the BMW i3 for themselves. Or English.
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
Last edited by SCOTT26; 10-28-2013 at 07:23 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2013, 01:39 PM | #24 | |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-29-2013, 06:38 AM | #25 |
First Lieutenant
73
Rep 364
Posts |
Scott26:
Was this what you refered to in this post: http://www.2addicts.com/forums/showt...2#post14764432 ? |
Appreciate
0
|
10-29-2013, 09:17 AM | #26 | |
Major General
5323
Rep 5,824
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-29-2013, 09:48 AM | #27 |
Major General
4465
Rep 9,160
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 08:59 AM | #28 | |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
Quote:
Using your definition then, Honda, VW, Ford, GM, Toyota, Daimler-Benz, Subaru, Fiat, just to name a few, are all independents as is BMW. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 09:52 AM | #29 | |
Major General
4465
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
a (1) : not subject to control by others : self-governing (2) : not affiliated with a larger controlling unit <an independent bookstore> Does that help? No one owns BMW, aside from investors and the Quandts. And yes, the companies you listed (except Subie) are indeed independent. Just for reference, some that aren't and have been consumed by others include Rolls, Porsche, Mini (part of what was formerly Rover), Land Rover (also part of Rover, but no longer part of BMW), Aston Martin, Jaguar, etc. In other words, no one in Japan, or the US, or France, calls the shots for BMW. I hardly think a single sports car platform being shared with Toyota will have much of impact on BMW's decisions, but perhaps it is the first chip in the wall, we'll see. What I think you've mistaken for independent is solitary, or singular manufacturing. Lexus, Scion and soon Prius being brands of Toyota does not mean to anyone besides you and maybe some of your incorrectly informed friends that Toyota is in anyway something other than independent. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 03:45 PM | #30 | |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
Quote:
Also, using your definition in the context of automobile corporations, then well over a majority of companies are "independent", which then I ask what makes BMW unique? You wrote "The i cars are a huge financial burden and a huge risk, but if the gamble pays off, it extends their time as one of very few independent car manufacturers." So now I am confused about your previous statement, what exactly did you mean? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 03:58 PM | #31 | |
Major General
4465
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
But let's say that BMW found themselves in financial difficulties. There are two levels of how they stand to lose their independence, by going public, but remaining essentially the same as they are now, BMW cars and motorcycles, MINI and Rolls, or by being acquired by one of the larger players, the latter being the more relevant towards this discussion. tl;dr - in order for the Quandts to retain control of BMW, the i program needs to be successful. If it's not BMW would either need to transition to a publicly held company, or become part of a larger car company. I'm guessing that the German appetite for investing in large ventures is slightly lower than it was a decade or more ago. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 09:18 PM | #32 | |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
Quote:
Shareholders structure by ownership[19] Stefan Quandt: 17.4% Johanna Quandt: 16.7% Susanne Klatten: 12.6% Free Float: 53.3% by types Strategic investors: 46.7% Institutional investors: North America: 15.8% United Kingdom and Ireland: 11.8% Other Europe: 5.7% Germany: 4.8% Rest of the world: 2.5% Other investors: 12.7% Not sure how this means it's a privately held corporation. The stock is traded on various exchanges across the globe. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2013, 08:52 AM | #33 |
Major General
4465
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Just to keep this derailment in full swing.
The Quandts control a near majority, in business terms, it's safe to say they hold an effective majority. Factor in the board members and they can pretty well ignore any investor opinions. Now force the sale of some of the Q's shares and it changes from a family controlled business to what would be considered a public company, driven by voting shares. You don't want an i3, right? |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2013, 06:30 PM | #34 |
Major General
5323
Rep 5,824
Posts |
BMWs strategy is to remain independent. Each division undergoes a management briefing where we are told time and time again that Independence is what the company strives for.
Many would like BMW. It will be the ultimate trophy. But the blue propeller will not be placed on any boardroom in Michigan or Wolfsburg for that matter. BMW in its current guise is actually worth twice more than Mercedes-Benz. BMW is the No 1 premium car manufacture in the world, sales rise thanks to new and exciting product and niche models. And in the coming months far more expansive product is coming both on a volume and niche scale. BMW has MINI and Rolls-Royce. Brands that were completely reborn under great investment and focused products that changed the perception of these brands. One shows the benefit of automobile culture and the genius of product marketing . The other is the epitome of high class luxury. Consider a rival with the same modus operandi that has (Maybach) and continues to crash and burn (Smart) BMWi is a substantial investment it starts with the BMWi brand but will spread through every BMW group model , whether its a BMW , Rolls-Royce and eventually a MINI. The company SGL is very much under control of the Quandts and the investigation and development to bring mass volume production of CFRP has brought other industries to their door wanting to take advantage of CFRP. This is when the investment begins to pay off. As other specific "transport" industries have sought expertise in the purchase and application of CFRP for their own industries. As does the auto industry particular the BMW-Toyota agreement , which will announce first details of their joint project at the Tokyo autoshow in November. Other automobile manufactures know this and they are pissed they have missed this opportunity. As with the i3 and i8 BMW control the narrative on premium electric mobility no one else is even close. Daimlers comments about the i3 against the B-Klasse were according to industry analysts, words of panic. Which is expected a response from BMW. The i3 and i8 are cars of a different nature there is nothing out there to even match up to their ideas and thinking. Comparisons between Tesla are just comparisons because they are electric. BMW does not have a competitor for the Model S. (Yet) just as Tesla does not have a competitor for the i3 (yet). Full figures of customer orders have not been revealed yet - an announcement is coming prior to the US/Japanese premieres. But in Europe, order an i3 today you can expect to take delivery in time for next summer.
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2013, 07:18 AM | #35 | ||
First Lieutenant
73
Rep 364
Posts |
Quote:
And I read a lot (from different continents and in different languages) in this subject. Quote:
That BMW (Model S competitor) is what I would love to swap my current 5-series touring (F11) for. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2013, 07:35 AM | #36 | |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
Quote:
From a 2010 Forbes article on control of the Ford Motor Company: "Today the Fords collectively own less than 2% of the automaker, but –as in 1956, when the company went public — they remain firmly in control with 40% of the voting power through a special class of stock." So the Quandts collectively own 46.7% of BMW and the Ford Family (all 81 living decedents) control 40% of the stock voting power, are you going to say Ford Motor Corporation is any less independent than BMW? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2013, 09:09 AM | #37 |
Major General
4465
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Do you like to argue just for the sake of it? Is your argument really that 80+ people are about the same as 3? Do you have kids or even venture outside occasionally? Surely you're just kidding?
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2013, 03:26 PM | #38 |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
No I don't like to argue for the sake of it. You haven't answered my original question. You've tried to tied some sort of minority of stock ownership by the Quandt family to enabling BMW to operate independently. I'd like to know: BMW wants to keep operating independently from what? BMW wants to remain independent from what, or who? My contention is BMW is no different than Ford, both corporations are run by a board of directors, both corporations have a management structure with a CEO at the top, and both companies manufacture several brands or automobiles that share components and platforms.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2013, 03:44 PM | #39 | |
Major General
4465
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
I've worked for "public" companies where the ownership is held in similar fashion to what the Quandts have, and it's so far from the idealistic American view of a public corporation. The top three owned about 35% of the voting shares and had managed over the years to get their cronies into the board, representing another 20+% of the shares. The board never really convened, the C level execs just called the shots and the board backed them up if investors cried. It was eye opening. I'm guessing you haven't worked in a similar situation? If Mulally could just pick up a blue phone and get 80 Ford family members to back him up and dive in, then this would be a similar situation, but the Quandts can get one or two other investors on board and ram things through. That's why they have a significantly different situation than just about any other car manufacturer. Piech and Pischetsrieder had similar stories, but through the VW and Porsche infighting have lost their strong hold on both companies. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-05-2013, 06:01 AM | #40 | |
General
17488
Rep 18,829
Posts |
Quote:
But still ownership of the corporation and it's independence from platform dilution are two entirely different things. When BMW was truly "independent" it made 3 or sometimes 4 platforms: 3-Series, 5-Series, and the 7-Series, sometimes a 6-Series coupe, and the 8-Series Coupe both however derived from the 5 and 7 Series respectively. So not to argue the point, but with the introduction of the X-Series (based off of the car platforms) and now the 4-door grand coupes (a 4-door based off a 2-door coupe based off a 4-door sedan - LOL) and the Mini/1-Series platform and the 7-Series/Rolls platform, BMW is no more independent auto manufacturer than a company such as Toyota, or Ford. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|