04-16-2016, 07:12 AM | #45 | |
Colonel
891
Rep 2,737
Posts |
Quote:
Again this is data taken from thousands of people theirs always going to be a few that break the mold but unfortunately like many drivers on the road today it doesn't work for everybody . Plus the problem is compounded when many of our customers are brought in for the concept study and given a various concepts and 90% of them want physical buttons. It's hard to push for something their not used to and in many ways keeps the automotive world from advancing into new bold directions but companies want to make money and they want to promote that they listen to their customers. We are in constant battle with engineering and ergonomics to try and break the mold and do knew things but it's hard, sometimes you get the best stuff with startups as they do not have the years and years of legacy that many others have. The cost reduction alone going to a screen instead of buttons is enormously big. But again the buttons if done right can be beautiful and if done right they can add something, it has to fit the product as well. It makes sense on an electric car, part of the Mini Coopers charm was the toggle switches on the center council which was a throw back to the Origanal. Having touch screens in a mini would not look right. Theirs never one pill for everything. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2016, 11:25 AM | #46 |
Banned
99
Rep 1,828
Posts
Drives: 2016 Tesla Model X P90DL
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near NYC
|
I totally understand what you're saying
The only thing I may disagree is that touchscreen is more for electric versus other cars. Regardless of the drivetrain you still have to perform the same functions Coming from years of BMWs and Audis experiences I can confidently say that touch screen works much easier for me. Everything is so well organized, I never have to think twice where to find specific feature Also as they add more new features with over the air update it doesn't have to create more buttons, just additional menu items etc. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2016, 01:57 PM | #47 |
Founder, Knights of the Roundel website
968
Rep 1,723
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 and 2018 AMG GT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Santa Monica Mountains, CA
|
Touch screen vs. mouse is one issue.
Also, most manufacturers who now use screens of some kind still have some dedicated buttons for radio and climate controls as those appear to be the ones used most where buttons rather than a computer screen are most useful. I think Tesla just took the cheapest way out. If you look at the interior of the S model (I haven't seen the X model yet), "cheapest way out" describes the entire interior and ergonomic experience.
__________________
Previously: 2014 i8; 2013 650i convertible; 2013 650i Gran Coupe; 2013 X1; 2010 550i GT; 2010 535 GT; 2010 Z4 3.5; 2008 535ixt; 2007 M6 convertible; 2006 650i convertible; 1996 Z3; 1980 633CSi; 1978 630CS; 1972 3.0CS; 1971 Bavaria. (1971; 1979-2005 & 2017 - ? -- the Mercedes years.)
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 08:55 AM | #48 | |
Banned
99
Rep 1,828
Posts
Drives: 2016 Tesla Model X P90DL
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near NYC
|
Quote:
I thought i-Drive was the best thing out there when i had it, but that quickly changed Complaining that Tesla cheap-ed out on the interior by utilizing touchscreen is like complaining not having extra physical buttons on your iPhone/iPad. Climate, volume, and etc are on the fixed portion of the screen and never move or disappear, regardless of the menu chosen Also, i can control most of the stuff from steering wheel Trust me, it is much easier to navigate through items in your car with the way Tesla implemented it Everything is one or two clicks (touches) away at the most |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 11:34 PM | #49 |
Founder, Knights of the Roundel website
968
Rep 1,723
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 and 2018 AMG GT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Santa Monica Mountains, CA
|
The X is having quality control problems and Tesla stock has crashed. Here's the story. (Sorry about the video coming on with Elon Musk pimping the new X.)
Since BMW has lost its iTeam to China's Tencent, my bet is on BMW buying out Tesla. Probably by 2018. BMW gets Tesla's battery plant, not too far from BMW's carbon fiber plant, Tesla's technology (such as it is) and Tesla gets BMW designers, exterior and interior. Plus BMW drivers will get to use the superchargers (and possibly upgraded batteries). A win-win. Watch for it. We will all be friends again!
__________________
Previously: 2014 i8; 2013 650i convertible; 2013 650i Gran Coupe; 2013 X1; 2010 550i GT; 2010 535 GT; 2010 Z4 3.5; 2008 535ixt; 2007 M6 convertible; 2006 650i convertible; 1996 Z3; 1980 633CSi; 1978 630CS; 1972 3.0CS; 1971 Bavaria. (1971; 1979-2005 & 2017 - ? -- the Mercedes years.)
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 09:47 AM | #50 |
Banned
99
Rep 1,828
Posts
Drives: 2016 Tesla Model X P90DL
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near NYC
|
Dreaming is not prohibited, i guess
X is just fine, especially the recent production Kinks are being worked out much faster compared to most manufacturers And, owner satisfaction is unheard of http://insideevs.com/consumer-report...-satisfaction/ Apparently, owners who experienced some issues, still love their cars But then again, it's well known for any car to have fair amount of problems in the introduction of new model P.S. For me personally, there are fewer trips to service center than in any other cars i've owned Last edited by AndreyATC; 04-20-2016 at 10:32 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 11:52 AM | #51 | |
Colonel
891
Rep 2,737
Posts |
Quote:
The i3 has also been the best BMW I have ever owned as the only issue I've had with it was a steering wheel switch and rear back up camera delaminating. If it where any other BMW I would have been to the shop countless times with engine and trans related issues. This would be my 8th BMW. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 02:05 PM | #52 | |
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,561
Posts |
Quote:
See the attached comparison chart vs. SPX - not looking too shabby for TSLA. If BMW was serious about EVs, it would be ramping up investment into them internally. Instead, the internal team defection indicates that they were getting bored senseless sitting on their asses without funding. That indicates BMW Corporate neglect of EVs, not budgeted additional investment into that product space. TSLA M&A would be very expensive, and borderline unaffordable for BMW. TSLA is already a $33B stock. With M&A premium, it would be a $50+B acquisition. BMW's market cap is only $54B as of today (similar to GM's and Ford's, by the way). By 2018, TSLA is likely to be in position to buy any of these 3, not the other way around. a
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 06:44 PM | #53 | |
Banned
99
Rep 1,828
Posts
Drives: 2016 Tesla Model X P90DL
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near NYC
|
Food for thought
Things are happening and happening quickly BMW should stop being ignorant and jump on Electric bandwagon as soon as possible http://www.thestreet.com/story/13538...h-roundup.html Quote:
Last edited by AndreyATC; 04-21-2016 at 09:02 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 09:44 AM | #54 | ||
Colonel
891
Rep 2,737
Posts |
Quote:
Growing up and seeing our auto industry being controlled with bean counters and cost reduction laid the way to sub par autos and a stained image. It's nice to see products fueled by passion again . It gets the rest of the world moving You build a good product the pennies will take care of themselves. |
||
Appreciate
1
|
04-24-2016, 09:50 PM | #55 | |
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,561
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2016/04...d-gigafactory/ a
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-25-2016, 06:13 AM | #56 | ||
Colonel
891
Rep 2,737
Posts |
Quote:
The model 3 I'm still going to wait till I see it in person sometimes things don't photo well but when seen in real life everything comes together. At least it confirmed my thoughts of the interior. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2016, 01:11 PM | #57 |
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,561
Posts |
"German automakers who once laughed off Elon Musk are now starting to worry...:
http://www.latimes.com/business/auto...419-story.html
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2016, 12:22 AM | #59 |
General of The Universe
50
Rep 418
Posts
Drives: 2015 BMW i8
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prospect, KY
|
this is the reality check that I believe in. There is no way that Musk can build a Model 3 for $35k. None of the actual details of production etc are worked out and we are to believe that because there are pre orders that this thing will come out on time and under budget. I live in the world of defense contracts and see this daily. NFW is what I say. I am sure it will be decent, but not at $35k, and there is no capacity to deliver anywhere near the preorder amounts. I'll believe it when I see it on sale in mass quantities.
http://www.driven.co.nz/news/news/wi...tually-launch/
__________________
2017 Tesla Model X P100D
2017 BMW M2 2015 BMW i8 & i3 1946 Willys CJ-2A 2009 Ferrari 612 Scaglietti OTO |
Appreciate
1
|
06-05-2016, 07:43 AM | #60 | |
General
17395
Rep 18,786
Posts |
Quote:
That would assume that the R&D development costs for the model S are now amortized (depends on how the company treats its accounting of these costs). So for the Model 3 to sell at an average of $42K retail price (Musk's number) Tesla somehow has to get somewhere between $40K to $60K out of the production cost of the Model 3 vs. the Model S to sell the Model 3 at a profit. Some of these costs can be reduced by an increase in production volume, but it's not a 1 for 1 gain, meaning if you increase production volume by 50% you don't reduce the cost of production by 50%. Another way to reduce the production cost of the car is to use a different chassis design, different materials, and a different component suite. For the Model 3 to cost (MSRP) about half of the Model S it will probably need a complete redesign of the chassis to make it less costly to produce - but that means MORE R&D cost to amortize. I've seen the raw chassis of the Model S and it looks quite expensive to produce and it is completely made out aluminum. It uses extrusions (that then need to be formed), complex castings (the front support is a work of art - and expensive to make), and stampings, all welded together. The battery, as a cost component of the vehicle, doesn't cost enough to manufacture that it provides a place to significantly reduce the cost of the car, so even though the Giga Factory is going to (significantly) reduce the cost of the battery, it not going to get a significant cost out of the production of the Model 3. On top of this, the EV market is still quite limited. It currently sits at about 1% of the US market sales. Move that number to say 5% of the market, it still is not enough increase is sales volume to increase production volumes to help significantly lower the cost of production. Throw in the fact that GM will have the Bolt in showrooms for sale by the 4th quarter of 2016 and illegible for the $7,500 tax credit is not going to help any of Tesla's efforts to sell the Model 3 at $42K (where by the time the majority of Model 3's are available to the public the Tax credit program will be over for Tesla).
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2016, 11:26 AM | #61 | ||
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,561
Posts |
Quote:
I've never been a "buy-American no matter what" kinda guy, but I feel like cheering for Tesla for that reason alone! Quote:
Though, there is no shortage of Tesla nay-sayers out there, even on these boards! a
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2016, 11:50 AM | #62 | |||
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,561
Posts |
Quote:
Tesla is making money on Model S - has been gross profit positive for may quarters now. They are negative net of R&D investment into new lines of business (GigaFactory, Model 3 scaling up, etc), but as long as those are NPV positive investments, they are doing the right thing. Their stated 2016 goal was to be net profitable, but when Model 3 demand exceeded expectations, they changed tack and decided to accelerate Model 3 production ramp-up and delay net profitability time frame: Old goal: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-te...-idUSKCN0VJ2J6 Why Tesla can go net profitable, if it forgoes investment into the future: http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...it-wanted.aspx Ditching old goal: http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/04/news...esla-earnings/ Quote:
Model 3 is a complete redesign of Model S, with an eye towards lowering manufacturing cost and shortening production cycle time. Quote:
Yet, Model 3 garnered ~380K pre-order deposits, which is ~3x the total EV sales in the US in 2015! I don't think anyone expected that, including Tesla. Evidently, there is this mountain of latent EV demand in the US marketplace that has remained untapped by the present EV offerings, including the i3 (sales falling YTD vs. 2015 YTD). Model 3 hit just the right mix of price / range / form-function to, potentially, triple EV sales in the US. Now the challenge for Tesla is to scale up production to meet that demand before someone else (Bolt?) does. It's definitely a problem, but a good one to have! a
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2016, 05:11 PM | #63 | |
General
17395
Rep 18,786
Posts |
Quote:
I think a lot of the pre-purchase Agreements are a lot of people thinking the Model 3 will be a Model S at $40K rather than $100K. Once the real car hits the streets and is critically reviewed, a lot of those potential sales could vaporize rather quickly. I doubt Tesla can make the Model 3 a quality-equivalent to the Model S at half the price. It's still a lot of money for a car that still has a limited range.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2016, 12:47 AM | #64 |
Captain
146
Rep 917
Posts
Drives: 2015 BMW M Sports Convertible
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Auckland New Zealand
|
As some knew I've been very close to buying an i3 but their's one big disadvantage in owning just a battery car. When the power goes down you're finished and stuck where it runs out and the small amount of petrol in the Rex tank has been used as well.
I've purchased a BMW's 225xe and it arrives 22nd June. Petrol is still cheap and owning the best of both worlds works for me. I can use battery around town and have the petrol option when driving freeways sipping very little petrol as well it's a lot cheaper to buy than an i3. The list of bad and good points is defiantly better than the i3 ever will be. People need to look past the hype and see which is going to work and work for the whole family. BMW has surpassed the Model 3 with their new 330e:- 5.9s 0-60 and 225xe:- 5.7s 0-60 which is fast enough. They each having a full petrol engines. Last edited by Kiwi; 06-06-2016 at 12:58 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2017, 03:46 PM | #65 | ||
Colonel
1164
Rep 2,561
Posts |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong: I test drove Model S, and loved many things about it: the handling, acceleration, interior quality, the tech. The size and turning radios, however, were way too big for my needs. And so was the price. Notice that I don't own, and don't foresee a need to own a 5-/7-sized vehicle. At least not for the next 5/10-years. Model 3 should address both of my key objections w.r.t. Model S. But it wasn't available when my i3 lease end date was coming up, so I got another i3 to bide time until my place in line for Model 3 is up. Likely some time in late-2018/early-2019, as I'm going to wait for the 'D' version to come out The spy shots of Model 3 release candidate on the road are not bad looking at all: https://electrek.co/2017/05/03/tesla...-new-4k-video/ https://electrek.co/guides/tesla-model-3/ Interior remains an open question, with HUD still not committed. Quote:
I fully expect to find lower quality and price interior components. Perhaps, something above Bolt, but below BMW. Which will be just fine. a
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2017, 10:34 AM | #66 |
Captain
146
Rep 917
Posts
Drives: 2015 BMW M Sports Convertible
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Auckland New Zealand
|
Come on Tesla loses money with every car it builds.
Just try and charge when the power goes down or you need to wait for hours to use a charging station. You still need a petrol engine combined with a plugin.
__________________
2015 220i M Sport convertible.
2016 225xe M Sport. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|