LOL I'm happy in general, no need to be concerned.
For the record, the man was asserting that the organization that had temporarily banned the
horse was engaged in cancel culture.
To be clear, I do not like the notion of "cancel culture". IMO, this matter was not related which is why I pointed it out at the beginning. Claiming that his horse was the victim of cancel culture is ridiculous. This man was adamant about his horse being clean and that the horse was never prescribed anything containing the banned substance. A few days later he is backtracking on that and feigning ignorance. You can decide what to believe.