Quote:
Originally Posted by SonnyParisi
because the aston has an engine (V12 or V8) & they have a certain appeal & they are very good looking cars. the i8 was a good looking car in 2014, 5 years later the roadster should
look at least a little different. the car under all perfect conditions in 3.8 & nobody has been able to get the same time since. it's a 4.0 second 0-60 car.
|
Nonsense. The car has hit 3.6, and has averaged 3.8 numerous times. If you’re going to criticize a car’s stats, then you should at least know it’s stats:
https://www.0-60specs.com/bmw-i8-0-60-times/
So, it is quicker than most Aston Martins. Significantly more efficient than any Aston Martin, and more bold in design that most Aston Martins. I8 turns more heads than any Vantage possibly can. So, I ask again, why not $160k?