Quote:
Originally Posted by FCobra94
Doesn't matter what he originally said; the point he is trying to make is that the likelihood of someone with a legally owned full-auto firearm committing a crime is the equivalent of someone committing jihad in their fully insured and properly registered Ferrari Enzo...it ain't gonna happen.
Don't understand why some choose to value semantics over common sense when trying to (poorly) argue their agenda...
|
Well, he originally said something along the lines of it being impossible for a member of the general public to own a fully automatic weapon...
and then came back to say.... well not without spending a lot of money.
I replied with an answer with a smiley face....
Now to your post. You say the point
he was trying to make was.... the likelihood of someone with a legally owned .....
let's see if Diesel will come on/in and say what point
he was trying to get across. Because I didn't get
your interpretation of
his point in
his posts.