05-03-2014, 12:02 PM | #23 |
General
17207
Rep 18,697
Posts |
I hope you realize that you are still saying the same thing. Following your logic, not driving anything regardless of it's configuration, is even more responsible, so why not just stop driving altogether? It's the same thing as saying guns kill people when actually people kill people. Guns are neither responsible or irresponsible, so mandating that guns only carry 6 bullets vs. 12 makes no difference; it's the same flawed (liberal/progressive) logic.
Last edited by Efthreeoh; 05-04-2014 at 07:11 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2014, 05:27 PM | #24 | |
Second Lieutenant
285
Rep 208
Posts
Drives: 23 BMW IX iDrive50, 23 Tesla X
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ohio, USA
|
Quote:
Don't go to work, don't earn a living, don't eat since you now don't have any money, eventually you starve and die thus saving the planet for the animals. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2014, 06:39 PM | #25 | |
Major
50
Rep 1,061
Posts |
Quote:
Windmills, solar cells, solar mirror arrays, more hydro, and tapping into tidal means more and more of the electricity produced is cleaner, too. Depending on where you live, with some of the credits and the shrinking costs, you may be able to recharge your vehicle with no recurring out of pocket costs. There will likely always be a place for an ICE vehicle and you have to start somewhere...BMW seems well-placed to maybe help swing the ignorance and misconceptions about what a plug-in electric can do, let alone a plug-in hybrid as in the i8. Both, at relatively affordable prices for a luxury vehicle. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2014, 09:17 PM | #26 |
General
17207
Rep 18,697
Posts |
Now you have the end of the logical argument; congratulations, you figured it out. By all means (ANY means) save the planet!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2014, 09:28 PM | #27 | |
General
17207
Rep 18,697
Posts |
Quote:
LOL, the i8 is affordable? Seriously? The thing is $140K. Let me just ask this, so if the whole concept here is to save the planet by helping "swing the ignorance and misconceptions", why then is a $35K Chevy Volt not the ideal car? 0 - 60 in 9 seconds (plenty fast for everyday use), can go 38 miles on a charge (about the average days use), and can serve as the single car for most families (they'll not need a pure ICE car for long trips), so consumption-wise it conserves resources (for all the other folks on the planet). Why do we need a super fast plug-in hybrid such as the i8 (that doesn't even have the same performance as a Corvette but at 3-times the price)? If the idea is to save the plant, why do we need such performance? Why is 0 - 60 in 9 seconds not adequate? And if you live in a city, where the i3 is the ideal non-ICE car, why not just take public transportation and not even buy a car at all? And you really need to look into the acreage-per-kilowatt thing... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2014, 10:32 PM | #28 |
Major
50
Rep 1,061
Posts |
Compare the cost of the i8 to other exotic CFRP hybrids, and it's a bargain by a long shot. And, being a clean sheet and in mass production, will (and has, the entire first year's production has already been sold and you can't take delivery of one yet) sell more. So, somebody thinks they're affordable!
The i3 was designed as a city vehicle - small, quick, short turning circle, easy to park, and fun to drive. It was not designed to compete with the Volt, or the Tesla, or, pretty much most any other car out there. If you get it, you get it, if you don't, you don't. If it fits your budge and lifestyle, you'll appreciate it, if it doesn't, you won't...none of that makes it a bad car. That BMW has needed to boost production considerably to match demand with longer-lead-time production equipment orders on the books, too, seems to indicate they believe the demand is genuine and will continue. The vast majority of the vehicle is either already made from recycled materials, sustainable materials, and can be recycled, and was made with considerations for how it was produced (like the CF production being near hydroelectric facilities rather than coal-fired power plants), where it could do its thing with less impact. By law, most vehicles and other products in Germany must contain a very considerable amount of recyclable materials, and instructions on how to do that to produce as close to virgin materials in that recycling process. IOW, they take the cradle to death of a product into account...something few places take into consideration to much of any degree. If you want a Volt, and it meets your needs and desires, great - it has some redeeming features. Same is true with the Leaf or the Ford, or the other electric or plug-in hybrids out there. Choice is good for more than one reason, one of which is what appeals to one does not necessarily appeal to the next. What's affordable to one is unattainable for others, that doesn't mean they cannot appreciate quality when they see it. For what the i3 is, it's priced accordingly. If it doesn't meet your needs or budget, only you can decide if it is worth the stretch to maybe acquire one. Few things in life are perfect, and except for maybe an identical twin, no two people are the same, so their desires and needs are unlikely to match. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2014, 10:50 PM | #29 | |
Private First Class
22
Rep 165
Posts |
Quote:
Some smarter folks than I posted good posts about challenges associated with "improving performance" with the i3 and those were highly relevant and genuinely appreciated. I can imagine software "updates" that allow for broader control of the range extender engine to provide better trip planning and hopefully greater gas tank capacity to make it a travel viable option. I really like the idea of a car like the i3 that is very small, nimble, and fun to race around the city in. I just want it to fit my broader need of having real travel functionality. Tweaks associated with that could make it more appealing.
__________________
1975 2002 Inka/blk, 1975 2002 Red/blk (lthr) (owned '77-'79), 1976 2002 blue/tan (lthr) (owned '80-'81), 1979 M1 Orange/blk (owned '82-'84), 1980 320iS Silver/blk, 1984 323i Drk blue/cream(European) E30, 1996 M3 White/blk E36, 1998 328i Silver/blk E46, 2002 330i Silver/blk E46, 2006 330i Silver/blk E90, 2008 335iSilver/blk E90, 2012 135i SGM/blk E82 (all with manual gearboxes), 2014 i3 rex Arravani Grey/terra
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 05:01 AM | #30 | |
General
17207
Rep 18,697
Posts |
Quote:
All cars are built of sustainable (ah, the new environmental buzzword) materials by the way, it's just the way you decide to look at the cycle. Most materials are recyclable dependent upon the cost of recapture and reprocessing. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 05:06 AM | #31 | |
General
17207
Rep 18,697
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Efthreeoh; 05-06-2014 at 05:18 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 01:19 PM | #34 | |
Second Lieutenant
285
Rep 208
Posts
Drives: 23 BMW IX iDrive50, 23 Tesla X
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ohio, USA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 02:32 PM | #35 | |
newb
0
Rep 31
Posts |
Quote:
The two performance tweaks most desired by the sort of folks interested in an i3 probably have nothing to do with acceleration or corning ability. I suggest that they are the ability to easily engage the REx prior to ~ 6% useable battery state of charge, and greater fuel tank capacity for purchasers in the USA (the rest of the world already have these.) I have it on good authority that the first is an easy fix that has already been worked out. The second might require the purchase of a non-USA spec fuel tank, but I believe the more likely tweak would be to simply remove a plug that I am guessing BMW engineered to reduce the tank capacity from 2.4 to 1.9 gallons. If it is part of the circular bulkhead cap shown in this diagram, it should be an easy swap for the non-USA part: |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 03:26 PM | #36 | |
Major
50
Rep 1,061
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 04:02 PM | #37 | |
Private First Class
22
Rep 165
Posts |
Quote:
http://bmwi3.blogspot.com/2014/04/mo...uncovered.html Finally disagree that performance improvements are so antithetical to the ethos of the i3 as it is still a BMW - 'The Ultimate Driving Machine'. No matter what gets tweaked it will be a great deal greener than my Dinan tuned 135i. I imagine crossing town in an i3 would also be quicker for me than were I driving the 135i, it is quicker off the line, taller with that enhanced visability, and it is 15 inches shorter so it can tuck into smaller gaps in traffic. All of that said the biggest improvements I care about are finding a way to use it on a weekend trip where charging options may be limited. If I have to fill up every 75 miles fine, just make it possible.
__________________
1975 2002 Inka/blk, 1975 2002 Red/blk (lthr) (owned '77-'79), 1976 2002 blue/tan (lthr) (owned '80-'81), 1979 M1 Orange/blk (owned '82-'84), 1980 320iS Silver/blk, 1984 323i Drk blue/cream(European) E30, 1996 M3 White/blk E36, 1998 328i Silver/blk E46, 2002 330i Silver/blk E46, 2006 330i Silver/blk E90, 2008 335iSilver/blk E90, 2012 135i SGM/blk E82 (all with manual gearboxes), 2014 i3 rex Arravani Grey/terra
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 04:47 PM | #38 |
Second Lieutenant
285
Rep 208
Posts
Drives: 23 BMW IX iDrive50, 23 Tesla X
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ohio, USA
|
I don't give a crap about the hype either, I just like the concept of EV powered transportation, love the quiet, no engine noise and love the cost per mile of around $0.03 per mile vs $0.12 in even a very fuel efficient ICE. That's what I care about. The rest is just so much external non relevant background noise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 05:58 PM | #39 | |
General
17207
Rep 18,697
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 06:34 PM | #40 | |
newb
0
Rep 31
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-06-2014, 10:31 PM | #41 | |
Major
50
Rep 1,061
Posts |
Quote:
But, the REx isn't powerful enough to keep up with long mountain grades at speed, so that needs to be considered into the picture...it is not, nor was it designed to be, a long-distance cruiser vehicle. If you like to take a leisurely ride cross-country, it could work if you planned your stops around recharge stations. That's going to be a bit hard over most of the USA for probably a long time, and plugging into 120-vac would make this a very long-term endeavor. Along say the east coast's megalopolis, you could probably do it (say between Boston and DC). But, there are lots of places, especially out west, where you can't find gasoline for over 100-miles, depending on your route, especially at certain times of the day. And, try that in the winter, you may have a bigger problem. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2014, 09:13 AM | #42 |
newb
0
Rep 31
Posts |
In many towns it is far, far quicker for a single occupant. Green or white stickers in California, and Alternative Fuel Vehicle tags in Georgia are only two examples of a great many legal authorizations for a single occupant vehicle to use HOV lanes.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2014, 05:42 PM | #43 |
Private First Class
22
Rep 165
Posts |
It has been five months since this thread went dormant. I recently read on the BMW BLOG about an owner that utilized the OBD II connection to change the settings to the European "Enable REx Hold option". With the REx engaged at 75% SOC he was able to drive from the (San Francisco) Bay Area over Donner Summit to Lake Tahoe. This is the "tune" that I have been waiting for. It does not suddenly make the i3 a great car for regular long trips, though it does unlock the opportunity to drive on those rare occasions when a couple hundred miles in a weekend is required, without plugging in.
95% of my driving will fall into the electric range and another 3-4% within the regular extended range. While I may only need this capability once a year it has been the reason I have not moved ahead with the i3. Now I am planning to do a three day test drive and look into the logistics of getting a 220 volt charger in my garage. While I am reasonably competent technologically, I still would not mind assistance with the coding change, could be a new cottage industry. Hooray
__________________
1975 2002 Inka/blk, 1975 2002 Red/blk (lthr) (owned '77-'79), 1976 2002 blue/tan (lthr) (owned '80-'81), 1979 M1 Orange/blk (owned '82-'84), 1980 320iS Silver/blk, 1984 323i Drk blue/cream(European) E30, 1996 M3 White/blk E36, 1998 328i Silver/blk E46, 2002 330i Silver/blk E46, 2006 330i Silver/blk E90, 2008 335iSilver/blk E90, 2012 135i SGM/blk E82 (all with manual gearboxes), 2014 i3 rex Arravani Grey/terra
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2014, 06:45 PM | #44 |
Private First Class
22
Rep 165
Posts |
As I think about the positives about this I can imagine BMW making changes that preclude owners from accessing this switch or removing it altogether from the software on USA bound vehicles. I would be exceptionally disappointed to acquire an i3, have the hold function enabled, and then a short time later have it permanently taken away.
__________________
1975 2002 Inka/blk, 1975 2002 Red/blk (lthr) (owned '77-'79), 1976 2002 blue/tan (lthr) (owned '80-'81), 1979 M1 Orange/blk (owned '82-'84), 1980 320iS Silver/blk, 1984 323i Drk blue/cream(European) E30, 1996 M3 White/blk E36, 1998 328i Silver/blk E46, 2002 330i Silver/blk E46, 2006 330i Silver/blk E90, 2008 335iSilver/blk E90, 2012 135i SGM/blk E82 (all with manual gearboxes), 2014 i3 rex Arravani Grey/terra
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|