BMW i
Forum for the BMW i3, i4 and i8
BMW i3 BMW i8
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

  BMW i Forums > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-16-2019, 01:52 AM   #199
hellrotm
Major General
2738
Rep
6,131
Posts

Drives: F80
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ...Location...Location

iTrader: (0)

Hope all the internet hate transfers to sales, so they are offered at a discount. But I have a feeling that won't happen, reviewers are going to like the car. I see Chris Harris doing skids already.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 08:31 AM   #200
Nextbooost
New Member
17
Rep
21
Posts

Drives: former 435, Supra, TLX
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris719 View Post
Why, because they own a 30 year old car that is way overrated?

I have no idea if this car is going to be good, but the Supra was not that great and the 2JZ is also way overrated.

There is no room in the automotive industry to produce a "legend" like that anyway. They have optimized every bit of the process, so engineers can't sneak in goodies.
Because they like me own a car that is only appreciating in value and this travesty soon to be a flop will not hurt my cars value in any way.

Supra was not only great but the greatest cat of its generation and no engine comes close to the earned legendary status of the 2j. Especially hilarious not so great and overrated coming form a bmw owner of all people.

Sure there is room, if there was not the LFA Hellcat Raptor ex would have never been made.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 09:27 AM   #201
bagekko
Lieutenant
bagekko's Avatar
United_States
155
Rep
518
Posts

Drives: Lots of BMWs
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: RI/MA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW X5 35d  [0.00]
1995 540i  [0.00]
2008 BMW M5  [0.00]
2013 BMW 135i Cabrio  [0.00]
Cuz they like to drop a 2JZ into everything, its like the LS1 here in the US

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertman123 View Post
Rant inbound:

Why is everyone on social media screaming to put a 2JZ in the car?

Stock for stock, that motor makes less power than the B58.
It's also way heavier. Iron block vs aluminum.
Wiring would be a nightmare.

So what do you gain? The privilege of spending even more money to make it have more power than the B58? Clout? Being able to sleep tight knowing your Supra has a 2JZ?
__________________
2008 BMW M5 6spd
1995 BMW 540i 6spd
2016 BMW M4 Vert 6spd
2017 BMW X5 35d MSport
2019 BMW i3 120ah REX
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 10:09 AM   #202
duder13
Captain
duder13's Avatar
649
Rep
778
Posts

Drives: Cashmere
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfindigital View Post
I get that, but there are so few complaints about the modern corolla/celica. At least this didn't come with a pathetic 150whp like the frs/86. And I wouldn't be shocked if audi built the next BMW, they already build everything else
I think itís a bit different cooperating with Suburu. I was just talking to a Supra lover who has the opinion that BMWs are only for showing off in parking lots. Itís a matter of pride, and Toyota lovers canít believe that Toyota wasnít able to build them their halo-ish car. I kinda think itís hilarious.
Appreciate 2
      01-16-2019, 10:32 AM   #203
mfindigital
Lieutenant
219
Rep
428
Posts

Drives: 2011 135i
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: los angeles

iTrader: (0)

A great breakdown. Car continues to look very striking, to me. The more I see, the more I want.
__________________
2011 Space Grey 135i, DCT MSport Suspension, M3 FSB, Berk Street Axle Back, MHD Stage 2+, VRSF Catless DP, VRSF 5" FMIC, VRSF LCP, BMS UCP.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 10:33 AM   #204
spetsnazos
Captain
761
Rep
909
Posts

Drives: M2C
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nextbooost View Post
Because they like me own a car that is only appreciating in value and this travesty soon to be a flop will not hurt my cars value in any way.

Supra was not only great but the greatest cat of its generation and no engine comes close to the earned legendary status of the 2j. Especially hilarious not so great and overrated coming form a bmw owner of all people.

Sure there is room, if there was not the LFA Hellcat Raptor ex would have never been made.
The English here was a bit sketchy so I couldn't make out what you said but if you only aim to buy cars that appreciate in value then all I can do is lol.

You ever drive any of them or do you scooter around town?
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 11:23 AM   #205
Powaup
Brigadier General
Powaup's Avatar
United_States
1094
Rep
3,647
Posts

Drives: M235i
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [5.00]
I'm trolling a bit but from a product line standpoint, the RC-F currently holds the top of the line spot of Toyota performance cars.

Entry level: GT-86 ($28K)
Mid Level: A90 Supra ($50K)
Flagship: Lexus RC-F ($80k)

Toyota execs must've seen this and decided not to make the Supra too powerful so that it did not cannibalize sales of the RC-F.

Hopefully, I am wrong, Toyota has said that they want 3 sports cars and hopefully they realized that the RC-F is a GT sedan for older sugar daddies and not close to a sports car. That would mean that there is still another sports car in the works by Toyota, maybe MR-2? but if that's the case where does it fit price wise? in between the $50k Supra and the $28k GT86?

Who knows at this point but I hope we get a $60k car with 380-400hp and some more neat stuff

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread View Post
Is it 420 where you are?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reed View Post
Lmao I think you mean the LFA, that's what should have been the Supra.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pz619 View Post
The only way the RC-F is going to beat the GTR, in any test that involves moving, is if the driver of the GTR is stuck at line because he's laughing so hard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3Post View Post
Really? I guess I missed the TOY GT-R killer = RC-F and all of its 467hp.
https://www.lexus.com/models/RCF
__________________
Appreciate 1
Red Bread3021.50

      01-16-2019, 11:34 AM   #206
bagekko
Lieutenant
bagekko's Avatar
United_States
155
Rep
518
Posts

Drives: Lots of BMWs
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: RI/MA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW X5 35d  [0.00]
1995 540i  [0.00]
2008 BMW M5  [0.00]
2013 BMW 135i Cabrio  [0.00]
All they would of had to do is take the LFA and make a cheaper version.

One of the nonsense things Toyota said was they no longer make straight 6 engines anymore and wanted the reborn Supra to have one.

If the partnership saved the Z4 thats good. Will Toyota sell a ton of the Supras yes. Will the hardcore Supra fan boys ever be happy no.

Unfortunately I dont think there will be a full blown M version of the new Z4, just the M40 half M variant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by duder13 View Post
I think itís a bit different cooperating with Suburu. I was just talking to a Supra lover who has the opinion that BMWs are only for showing off in parking lots. Itís a matter of pride, and Toyota lovers canít believe that Toyota wasnít able to build them their halo-ish car. I kinda think itís hilarious.
__________________
2008 BMW M5 6spd
1995 BMW 540i 6spd
2016 BMW M4 Vert 6spd
2017 BMW X5 35d MSport
2019 BMW i3 120ah REX
Appreciate 1
duder13649.00

      01-16-2019, 11:45 AM   #207
MightyMouseTech
Major General
MightyMouseTech's Avatar
3421
Rep
5,399
Posts

Drives: 13 135i 6MT LeMans Blue MSport
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Good luck Toyota boys.
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 2
      01-16-2019, 12:07 PM   #208
MarkDemma
First Lieutenant
MarkDemma's Avatar
United_States
308
Rep
384
Posts

Drives: F22 M240i / E46 330Ci ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powaup View Post
I'm trolling a bit but from a product line standpoint, the RC-F currently holds the top of the line spot of Toyota performance cars.

Entry level: GT-86 ($28K)
Mid Level: A90 Supra ($50K)
Flagship: Lexus RC-F ($80k)

Toyota execs must've seen this and decided not to make the Supra too powerful so that it did not cannibalize sales of the RC-F.

Hopefully, I am wrong, Toyota has said that they want 3 sports cars and hopefully they realized that the RC-F is a GT sedan for older sugar daddies and not close to a sports car. That would mean that there is still another sports car in the works by Toyota, maybe MR-2? but if that's the case where does it fit price wise? in between the $50k Supra and the $28k GT86?

Who knows at this point but I hope we get a $60k car with 380-400hp and some more neat stuff
That makes perfect sense. I saw a quote in an article today from one of the designers who said that part of the reason they aren't currently offering a manual is because they fear it would cannibalize sales of the 86. I would imagine the manual from the M240i would work just fine in this car. It also explains why they would have opted for only offering the lower powered new B58, presumably the B58B30M1. In the same article he said that 335 HP was the "right amount of power" for that car... which if the Z4 can handle 382 HP there is no reason the Supra couldn't. I wouldn't think they would want to put an engine with just 30 less HP than the Lexus RC-F, in a car weighing like 500 lbs less ... cause I would think that it would wallop it on the track.

But I would imagine that just like the previous generation Supra that the first thing a Supra fan would do is start modding the engine immediately. The B58 has been out long enough now that there are already a good amount of them available. Here's hoping that getting some Supras on the road will speed up that process and, say for instance, Dinan will speed up releasing the flash tune for the B58. (Although I have to admit I'm ignorant if a tune meant for a B58B30M0 would work on a B58B30M1.)

And hey, maybe at some point BMW will drop a S58 engine in a "Z4M" and Toyota could get it put into the Supra as well. By that point the current gen RC-F will be long in the tooth enough to either retire or will need a major upgrade. Maybe in that hypothetical version at least some of the air scoops will be functional.
Appreciate 1
Powaup1093.50

      01-16-2019, 12:25 PM   #209
glennQNYC
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
glennQNYC's Avatar
United_States
5418
Rep
4,995
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [4.87]
Love that active cruise control is an option on the Supra. If I can fit a set of golf clubs in the back (as I suspect you can), this is a car I'd definitely consider. They just better provide an interior without those disgusting red highlights.
__________________
Appreciate 1
Powaup1093.50

      01-16-2019, 12:29 PM   #210
duder13
Captain
duder13's Avatar
649
Rep
778
Posts

Drives: Cashmere
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bagekko View Post
All they would of had to do is take the LFA and make a cheaper version.

One of the nonsense things Toyota said was they no longer make straight 6 engines anymore and wanted the reborn Supra to have one.

If the partnership saved the Z4 thats good. Will Toyota sell a ton of the Supras yes. Will the hardcore Supra fan boys ever be happy no.

Unfortunately I dont think there will be a full blown M version of the new Z4, just the M40 half M variant.
Yeah, considering the cars that the '90s Supra was gunning for, the Lexus LC is really closer to what that Supra was, albeit more luxurious. Toyota just needed to make a less fancy LC for $65K.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 12:42 PM   #211
Prevost87
Enlisted Member
14
Rep
37
Posts

Drives: BMW X3 M40i
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

Imagine if Toyota took the 2j and revised it with modern-day tech. Minimized R&D cost while continuing the legendary status.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 12:52 PM   #212
Nextbooost
New Member
17
Rep
21
Posts

Drives: former 435, Supra, TLX
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powaup View Post
I'm trolling a bit but from a product line standpoint, the RC-F currently holds the top of the line spot of Toyota performance cars.

Entry level: GT-86 ($28K)
Mid Level: A90 Supra ($50K)
Flagship: Lexus RC-F ($80k)

Toyota execs must've seen this and decided not to make the Supra too powerful so that it did not cannibalize sales of the RC-F.

Hopefully, I am wrong, Toyota has said that they want 3 sports cars and hopefully they realized that the RC-F is a GT sedan for older sugar daddies and not close to a sports car. That would mean that there is still another sports car in the works by Toyota, maybe MR-2? but if that's the case where does it fit price wise? in between the $50k Supra and the $28k GT86?

Who knows at this point but I hope we get a $60k car with 380-400hp and some more neat stuff
Seems like grasping at straws to explain Toyotas massive stupidity and failure with this car.

Lexus and toyota are not cross shopped nor do each others strategy really effect the other. Supra should have been a performance beast while the lexus a gentleman racer a comfy yet sporty gt kinda car.

No chance in hell that the blunder that is the Supra is because they were worried about the RCF. Also it was said that Toyota wanted 3 sports cars, Lexus has nothing to do with that they do their own thing.

They should have built the Supra on a lexus platform made a rcf replacement on it and hell maybe even used the chassis to bring back the Celica while letting the 86 die off.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 01:27 PM   #213
swunder
Second Lieutenant
265
Rep
246
Posts

Drives: 135is, X3
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: New Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by duder13 View Post
I think the problem is that Toyota fanboys have long thought of their Supra as the "anti-German/anti-Yuppie" sports car that has a huge tuner community backing it up. Now that their new car is essentially a BMW, they're having a hard time digesting it.

Can you imagine if the next M3 was built by Audi, or even Porsche? Guys around here would go nuts.
Exactly, and its fair they/we would go nuts.

Listen, I don't know anything about the supra heritage or community or hardcore fan base but it seems obvious this 'Supra' has NOTHING to do with it. Even if its a great car it should have a different name.

Why can't toyota/lexus make their own interior and engine? Why can't it have a stick shift? Old M guys still get to have one in the m2/3/4. What about old Toyota guys?

Toyota and BMW are just abusing the Supra name to fund a lame partnership selling a cheaper Z4. I am totally missing the point of this car.
Appreciate 1
duder13649.00

      01-16-2019, 01:40 PM   #214
MarkDemma
First Lieutenant
MarkDemma's Avatar
United_States
308
Rep
384
Posts

Drives: F22 M240i / E46 330Ci ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prevost87 View Post
Imagine if Toyota took the 2j and revised it with modern-day tech. Minimized R&D cost while continuing the legendary status.
I can't even imagine what it would cost to take an obsolete engine design from the 90s and update to pass modern emissions and fuel consumption requirements. For the volume of sales there is no way it was going to happen.

From everything I've read, it was either find a partner that had an I6 engine that they could use or not do it at all.

Considering how many awards the B58 has won, it's not like it's a crap engine. By the time they would have engineered their own new I6 it would have ended up being very very similar to the B58 anyway as they would have likely made the same design decisions that BMW had to in order to make it as efficient, cost effective and emissions compliant as a modern engine has to be.

So had they redesigned their own, the same people would be complaining that they had to made these design choices. You simply can't make an engine like the 2JZ anymore ... any more than you can make things like non turbo V8s ... something else people pine for.

The real question is - if you want a modern I6 RWD two seater sports car with Japanese styling ... does this fit the bill? It's a VERY small market segment these days and the few other offerings are getting VERY long in the tooth and may not be updated / just get discontinued.
Appreciate 1
glennQNYC5417.50

      01-16-2019, 01:47 PM   #215
Prevost87
Enlisted Member
14
Rep
37
Posts

Drives: BMW X3 M40i
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDemma View Post
I can't even imagine what it would cost to take an obsolete engine design from the 90s and update to pass modern emissions and fuel consumption requirements. For the volume of sales there is no way it was going to happen.

From everything I've read, it was either find a partner that had an I6 engine that they could use or not do it at all.

Considering how many awards the B58 has won, it's not like it's a crap engine. By the time they would have engineered their own new I6 it would have ended up being very very similar to the B58 anyway as they would have likely made the same design decisions that BMW had to in order to make it as efficient, cost effective and emissions compliant as a modern engine has to be.

So had they redesigned their own, the same people would be complaining that they had to made these design choices. You simply can't make an engine like the 2JZ anymore ... any more than you can make things like non turbo V8s ... something else people pine for.

The real question is - if you want a modern I6 RWD two seater sports car with Japanese styling ... does this fit the bill? It's a VERY small market segment these days and the few other offerings are getting VERY long in the tooth and may not be updated / just get discontinued.
Fuel efficiency of a modded 2j would be average I think but the emissions I did not consider. Very strong points and you are right about the B58 being a great motor of choice. Voted in the top 10 engines of 2019 I believe.
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 01:56 PM   #216
XutvJet
Brigadier General
2287
Rep
3,134
Posts

Drives: 2016 M235 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Kansas City

iTrader: (-1)

Here's my take.

I'm entirely fine with the extensive parts bin sharing, especially if it's more BMW than Toyota.

Labor and parts should be cheaper with the Supra compared to the Z4 for obvious reasons.

Yes, the Supra uses a detuned B58 vs the Z4, but we all know how easy it is to get power out of the turbo BMWs. The B58 in Supra is the same as the MPPK B58 used in the M240. That car puts down ~335whp/370wtq in stock form or around 390hp and 430tq at the flywheel. The Supra weighs about 150lbs less than a M240 8AT. An M240 8AT runs 12.5-12.7@109-111mph stock in the 1/4 mile. With a basic tune, the M240s are running low low 12s. With less weight, the Supra should be a 12.3-12.5@111-113mph car in stock form. That puts it in the acceleration realm of the Mustang GT350. This Supra is monumentally faster in stock form than the previous gen.

The power of the Supra and the power delivery will make for an extremely fun car on the street and track. It's what I love about my M235. It has plenty of power and you can use it without feeling like the car is trying to kill you. The power delivery (stock tune) is linear right up to the fuel cut. The B58 even more so. Thus, it's makes exploring limits exciting and rewarding and something you can do daily if you're a decent driver. The Supra should obviously be an even better handler.

The pricing is spot on for what you get. I'm honestly surprised it's in the low to mid 50s.

Styling wise, I like the overall shape and form. They were going for the Toyota GT2000 look which they did quite nicely. What I don't like is all the tacked on aero work. It's unnecessary. Same goes for tail end. It's too much. They should have made the rear and nose more organic looking. Right now the car is dialed up to 11 and trying a bit too hard. Lots of cars these days have this issue. Dialed down to the 9 would be perfect and timeless for the Supra. All it would take is a better choice of wheel and perhaps a very mild drop.

I'm definitely considering this car assuming it doesn't offend me once I see it in person. White for me and I'd probably yank a few of the aero bits.
__________________
Country over party
Appreciate 3
alex2364954.00
SakhirM49421.00
Viffermike1685.50

      01-16-2019, 03:04 PM   #217
Z K
Brigadier General
Z K's Avatar
United_States
1393
Rep
4,816
Posts

Drives: E90 M3, F30 328i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (3)

I think it's fine for them to share stuff with BMW and create a car... Engine, chassis, interior etc. but this is 100% BMW. There is no uniqueness for this car as a Toyota. Toyota basically just slapped a body kit on the Z4, a hard top and a bunch of emblems and call this a Supra. It's a massive failure for Toyota as a car company.

The 86 cars that were created as a joint venture is a much better example of how a car is created by two companies working together. It has a chassis made and tuned by Toyota and Subaru and a Subaru flat 4 with Toyota DI technology. It utilizes the expertise of both companies to create something truly unique and an example of both company's engineering.

Will this be a fun car? Probably, but from a Toyota sports car standpoint, its a very sad day.
__________________
Auto Detailing Enthusiast!
Appreciate 1
      01-16-2019, 03:10 PM   #218
MarkDemma
First Lieutenant
MarkDemma's Avatar
United_States
308
Rep
384
Posts

Drives: F22 M240i / E46 330Ci ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z K View Post
I think it's fine for them to share stuff with BMW and create a car... Engine, chassis, interior etc. but this is 100% BMW. There is no uniqueness for this car as a Toyota. Toyota basically just slapped a body kit on the Z4, a hard top and a bunch of emblems and call this a Supra. It's a massive failure for Toyota as a car company.

The 86 cars that were created as a joint venture is a much better example of how a car is created by two companies working together. It has a chassis made and tuned by Toyota and Subaru and a Subaru flat 4 with Toyota DI technology. It utilizes the expertise of both companies to create something truly unique and an example of both company's engineering.

Will this be a fun car? Probably, but from a Toyota sports car standpoint, its a very sad day.
You forgot that Toyota added much in the way of fake air vent technology.
Appreciate 1
Z K1392.50

      01-16-2019, 03:16 PM   #219
Grumpy Old Man
Lieutenant Colonel
Grumpy Old Man's Avatar
Canada
3194
Rep
1,957
Posts

Drives: Porsche 993, 2015 MB GLK
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Niagara on the Lake

iTrader: (0)

What would you rather.....Supra or Z4M?

https://g29.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1574107
Appreciate 0
      01-16-2019, 03:32 PM   #220
Z K
Brigadier General
Z K's Avatar
United_States
1393
Rep
4,816
Posts

Drives: E90 M3, F30 328i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDemma View Post
You forgot that Toyota added much in the way of fake air vent technology.
Yes, can't forget that... I especially like the one on the door. A stick on vent that goes no where.
__________________
Auto Detailing Enthusiast!
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.




bmw
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST