03-08-2018, 02:55 AM | #1 |
Sergeant First Class
87
Rep 150
Posts |
JB4 on stock 340i sound? Deciding on exhaust thread
Considering a JB4 for my 2018 340i. I fully understand the JB4 is not built for increasing sound, but is the sound increased in sport mode or any mode for that matter on a completly stock 340i. I am planning the JB4 in the future but the current stock exhaust seems too quite and was hoping it may increase the sound. Is it a difference like going from comfort to sport? Even just a minor amount would help. Also hoping after its fully broken in it will increase. I am really hesitant to put a catback right now... though I am ok with doing JB4 sooner. Any advice?
Last edited by Rob340i; 03-12-2018 at 03:39 PM.. |
03-08-2018, 04:24 AM | #2 | |
Second Lieutenant
98
Rep 235
Posts |
Quote:
The stock exhaust note will not increase regardless of tune or not. Just spring for the catback or start with a resonator delete. Catbacks on this car are not very loud at all. They're all fairly mild yet aggressive. Like 3/10 driving around town and 6/10 when you get on it. I highly recommend the AWE Tuning exhaust although a resonator and/or muffler delete is much cheaper and has 90% of the sound. Car will not be obnoxiously loud or drone with any catback option you choose. Modding my exhaust was the best decision I've made for this car and I'd take it over any other mod I've done to the car.
__________________
Current - 2018 M2 | VRSF Chargepipe | VRSF Catless Downpipe | Dinan Catback | Turner Motorsports Intake
Previous - 2016 340i M-Sport | AWE Tuning Touring Edition Exhaust w/ Non-Resonated Performance Mid Pipe | Agency Power Intake | Active Autowerke Activ-8 | VRSF Catless Downpipe |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2018, 04:36 AM | #3 |
Sergeant First Class
87
Rep 150
Posts |
Ok the only reason i hesitate is i dont want it too loud, and i dont want to lose the valve. I would like a deeper low tone maybe just a few decibles louder than stock. I want to put it in sport mode when i want to hear it and tone it back to comfort/eco pro when i dont.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2018, 07:56 AM | #4 | |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
The M Performance muffler is the quietest solution but will increase volume all the time - not by much though... just a little. LIttle more in sport since the valve opens a little more (not a huge difference honestly from comfort though)
Resonator Delete you will hate -- its like having the valve all the time in all modes. The MPPSK is the best of both worlds.. bonus is +2 PSI of boost (20 - 30 HP) Comfort is stock quiet (little noisier when you gun it)... but in Sportsounds like a monster... The JB4 has nothing to do with sound. Boost has nothing to do with exhaust noise. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2018, 03:31 PM | #6 |
Second Lieutenant
98
Rep 235
Posts |
It's not worth it unless you have it port installed. JB4 and a resonator delete or just a downpipe will give you much more power and a nice sound that's not too loud and allows you to retain valve.
__________________
Current - 2018 M2 | VRSF Chargepipe | VRSF Catless Downpipe | Dinan Catback | Turner Motorsports Intake
Previous - 2016 340i M-Sport | AWE Tuning Touring Edition Exhaust w/ Non-Resonated Performance Mid Pipe | Agency Power Intake | Active Autowerke Activ-8 | VRSF Catless Downpipe |
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2018, 03:37 PM | #7 |
Major
707
Rep 1,169
Posts |
I don't think you'd regret getting it, I have not heard anyone who did say they wish they hadn't. The exhaust can be quiet when required but I run in Sport all the time and only offend people when I want to. Extra HP and TRQ are a noticeable plus. It's not the cheapest route to better sound or power but for me the Warranty and peace of mind is well worth the money.
__________________
'16 340xi Mineral Grey/Black Leather, MPSS on 18" 398 Orbit Grey wheels, ZF 8HP50, MPPSK+CF Tips, ZTR, ZMP, ZTP, ZCW, ZDA, ZDB, Black Kidney Grilles.
'09 Outback for a beater and grocery getter. |
Appreciate
1
bimmer4563002.50 |
03-08-2018, 09:09 PM | #8 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
4927
Rep 116,006
Posts |
JB4 won't have any impact on exhaust tone / overall loudness..
Like mentioned above intake noise if you have an open element will be increased as you are running more boost. Catless downpipes with stock exhaust sound awesome in my books. Mike |
Appreciate
1
wassy497.50 |
03-09-2018, 06:24 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 09:59 AM | #10 |
Sergeant First Class
87
Rep 150
Posts |
Then again Remus cat back and later jb4 sounds better cost wise and would not be a bad setup either. Wondering whether the remus performance mid pipe is a straight through no resonator or is it a high flow resonator/cat?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 10:12 AM | #11 |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
In fact if I were to do it all over again - yes... JB4 plus cat back plus resonator delete is the most cost effective option and will sound just as good as the MPPSK and will perform even better..
But keep in mind - you just said a few posts ago you didnt want loud. The moment you remove the resonator and add a catback it will be loud all the time.. the valve is useless in that respect. Honeslty there is no other solution that is the MPPSK - its costly but a fantastic solution for the lazy that doesnt want loud all the time... I have JB4 ontop the MPPSK for the added boost.. Last edited by riskmaker76; 03-09-2018 at 10:18 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 12:11 PM | #12 | |
Second Lieutenant
98
Rep 235
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current - 2018 M2 | VRSF Chargepipe | VRSF Catless Downpipe | Dinan Catback | Turner Motorsports Intake
Previous - 2016 340i M-Sport | AWE Tuning Touring Edition Exhaust w/ Non-Resonated Performance Mid Pipe | Agency Power Intake | Active Autowerke Activ-8 | VRSF Catless Downpipe |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 01:26 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
cat back is a waste of money IMO without the resonator delete.. and
comfort mode even WOT doesnt sound anywhere near what an open valve on the MPPSK sounds like - cant even compare the two MPPSK essentially is a resonator and exhaust delete. When the valve opens exhaust is routed around the muffler and becomes pretty much an open straight back pipe with the resonator is removed. Its far far louder then WOT in comfort mode.. In comfort mode the exhaust is routed into the Muffler which probably is a quieter one then the stock... Comfort on MPPSK is no louder then comfort on a non mppsk car. WOT - I bet is similar too.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 01:29 PM | #14 | |
Second Lieutenant
98
Rep 235
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current - 2018 M2 | VRSF Chargepipe | VRSF Catless Downpipe | Dinan Catback | Turner Motorsports Intake
Previous - 2016 340i M-Sport | AWE Tuning Touring Edition Exhaust w/ Non-Resonated Performance Mid Pipe | Agency Power Intake | Active Autowerke Activ-8 | VRSF Catless Downpipe |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 01:38 PM | #15 | |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
Sorry... I meant axle back is a waste of money - which caused the confusion..
The problem is being able to control the sound - if that is not a priority then I wholly agree Cat back plus JB4 is the way to go. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 01:39 PM | #16 | ||
Second Lieutenant
98
Rep 235
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current - 2018 M2 | VRSF Chargepipe | VRSF Catless Downpipe | Dinan Catback | Turner Motorsports Intake
Previous - 2016 340i M-Sport | AWE Tuning Touring Edition Exhaust w/ Non-Resonated Performance Mid Pipe | Agency Power Intake | Active Autowerke Activ-8 | VRSF Catless Downpipe |
||
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 01:49 PM | #17 |
First Lieutenant
83
Rep 348
Posts |
Many have said a tune wouldn't change the sound but wouldn't getting Bootmod3 with a burble tune change the stock exhaust output sounds as well and also provide a nice boost? Isn't this a better option over MPPSK unless warranties an issue? A lot cheaper and you can even get an aftermarket carbon fiber intake and still be saving.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2018, 03:14 PM | #18 | |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
Not relevant to this discussion we are talking B58 motors not N55..
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-10-2018, 04:33 AM | #20 |
Sergeant First Class
87
Rep 150
Posts |
So remus with valve will probably be the way i will go. Does AWE still keep the valve?Also the awe with resonator delete i think would drone too much. So thats out does the remus have a resonator? so should i do remus cat back or awe without mid pipe res delete?
What about AFE? Last edited by Rob340i; 03-10-2018 at 05:00 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-10-2018, 05:52 AM | #21 |
Lieutenant
126
Rep 484
Posts
Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY
|
Anything without a resonator delete is a waste... just an axle back then
Remus keeps the original valve... that means it will function like a stock exhaust... just keep that in mind.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-10-2018, 05:57 AM | #22 | |
Sergeant First Class
87
Rep 150
Posts |
Quote:
And because it keeps its original valve and funtions like stock thats good or bad what are u getting at? What about just doing remus mid pipe only will it increase sound from stock exhaust without drone? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|